For practitioners considering Weekly Reset

Weekly Reset, reviewed for practice.

A source-visible practitioner review of Weekly Reset: service scope, participant journey, privacy boundaries, deterministic design, current evidence and limitations.

The short version

  • Non-diagnostic weekly planning and coaching support.
  • A deterministic, versioned recommendation engine.
  • Room hosts receive progress counts, not private participant answers.
  • Poko-specific human outcome validation is not complete.
  • Referral-facing claims remain off until the human-validation and regulatory gates pass.

What the participant does

  1. Start with your real week.
  2. Notice what is shaping it.
  3. Choose what will help.
  4. Build your plan.
  5. Make it workable.

Current evidence and limits

Non-diagnostic support that sits alongside care

Weekly Reset is currently positioned as non-diagnostic consumer weekly planning and coaching support, not as diagnosis, treatment, emergency support or clinical decision support.

Limit: This statement is a product boundary, not a TGA classification, legal opinion or AHPRA endorsement. The practitioner-guided feature requires separate intended-purpose and regulatory review before referral-facing release.

Claim and sources

Deterministic, version-bound recommendations

For the same definition version and the same active input history, the Weekly Reset V3 engine produces byte-identical recommendation output.

Limit: Determinism makes behaviour reproducible; it does not prove that an output is correct, effective or suitable for every participant.

Claim and sources

Room hosts do not receive private answers

In the current group-hosted implementation, room-host output contains aggregate progress counts and excludes participant answers and practitioner records.

Limit: This is an implementation claim, not an independent privacy or security audit. The operative privacy notice and deployed version remain controlling.

Claim and sources

Poko human validation is not complete

Poko-specific professional review, intended-population cognitive interviews, open-interview comparison and real-session pilot evidence have not yet been completed for Weekly Reset 3.0.0-runtime.2.

Limit: No effectiveness, equivalence, subgroup, burden or referral-facing conclusion should be inferred before these gates pass.

Claim and sources